Trump’s American AI Initiative Reveals Massive Gaps and Inconsistencies in AI Research, Development and Implementation Capabilities in the U.S.

by topic_admin
19 views

Earlier this month ), on February 11, 2019, President Donald Trump issued an executive order called the American AI Initiative mandating federal agencies to leverage artificial intelligence, or AI, in their operations. While the arrangement will mention that privacy protection is crucial, will pressured adoption of AI open doors up to privacy violations? That’s only one of several questions raised by means of an initiative which shows massive holes in the (non-)existing frame for artificial intelligence growth and installation on a massive scale.

Any brand new initiative is typically met with resistance. Since Trump’s order directs federal agencies to collaborate with public and private entities, this might be only the catalyst we’t all been waiting for. Several industries already embrace AI procedures into their daily operations, but the American AI Initiative will induce laggard industries into action. At least, that’s the hope.

Why is AI adoption not more universal across the commercial landscape?

One of the motives, as we’t noticed, is resistance to change. But the underlying fear is not only a change of modus operandi. It is the fear of losing jobs to AI entities like bots and automated procedures. Several AI specialists have warned of enormous job losses to machine learning and profound learning applications that automate what people now do, and there is now a new fear that forcing federal agencies to reallocate capital towards AI implementation might exacerbate the issue.

To be apparent, the authorities isn’t giving any additional funding for this initiative. It is only a mandate to infuse more AI-associated technologies so agencies – as well as public and private industry entities – could compete in the international stadium.

In an effort to quantify this, the 2017 World Robot Statistics, issued by the International Federation of Robotics (IFR), shows that the United States is behind countries like South Korea, Singapore, Germany and Japan in conditions of the amount of robots each 10,000 workers in the manufacturing industry.

While the U.S. is way over the worldwide average in this respect, there are industries like legal which are much behind in AI adoption. Again, among the worries of several law firms and ancillary industries is that AI will eliminate human tasks.

The fear is not totally unfounded. Recent operate by law enforcement and companies demonstrate that AI applications are somewhat more precise than individual attorneys when it comes to predicting certain things, like spotting risks and vulnerability in non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and predicting the result of insurance claims.

A great deal of the operate at authorized firms is repetitive and pattern-rich, which is ideal for machine learning algorithms to quickly learn and master. In the instance of the NDA reviews, the AI application managed to finish reviewing a contract in 26 seconds. An individual lawyer took 92 minutes.

Forcing alter in this type of environment might have unforeseen repercussions. The American AI Initiative doesn’t really provide a frame for AI growth or implementation store for a couple of overarching guidelines which fall much short of a real blueprint for the future.

The details are scant, bringing further ambiguity into an already cloudy AI landscape. For instance, there’s no mention of cloud tools will be made accessible to AI investigators in the private and public business, nor is there any hint to how national agencies will “prioritize investments” in AI amp & R ;D.

In reality, it is less comprehensive and articulate than the 2016 Obama administration report the various facets of implementing AI on such a scale.

We just showcased the legal industry as a situation in point for the way such a directive could blow up in our faces. It’s going to be no different in any other industry that you pick. Unless there’s a very clear frame to go with any mandate, either executive or otherwise, companies and even national agencies will be abandoned for their own devices.

This may mean divergent and contradictory policies being implemented in silo type, and private and public sector companies will only need to pick and select the tools which are haphazardly made available to them under this arrangement.

One saving grace of the dictate might be the establishment of criteria, however there’s a good deal of ambiguity in developing “reliable, robust, trustworthy, secure, portable, and interoperable AI systems.” The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was given the responsibility of making certain such systems are manufactured ( which leaves it open to interpretation since it doesn’t use a collaborative strategy. Are we going to find a FTC-Net-Neutralty-kind narrative unfold around again?

Another point to notice is the fact that AI talent deficit is in an all-time high. With President Trump’s stand on immigrant employees vis-a-vis visas (whew!) , we might be looking at a brain-drain right at the time when immigrant ability is required. How will the government strategy to satisfy this growing demand for AI ability when domestic resources are obviously insufficient to fulfil current open positions in the field of information science and artificial intelligence?

To give you a snapshot of the magnitude of this issue, here’s what the chasm between requirement and distribution seems like right now:

With uncertainty escalating among skilled workers from countries like India who rely on H1B visas, the executive arrangement just puts more strain to a talent pool which ’s being outstripped by demand for an alarming speed.

There are a few more factors which are associated with the mandate which harbor ’t been made explicit nonetheless. According into Michael Kratsios, the White House Deputy Assistant into the President for Technology Policy:

“The American AI Initiative will build on this success by leveraging our R&D ecosystem of industry, academia, and government and prioritizing federal investments of cutting-edge ideas that can directly benefit the American people. An integral part of the initiative will include federal agencies developing AI R&D budgets to support their core missions.”

The achievement he describes in that remark is that “America has been the leader in AI from its inception.”

Is that still the instance, when we understand that Chinese companies like Tencent, Baidu and Alibaba, representing a combined market share of more than a trillion dollars ($1,000,000,000,000), are already heavily invested in AI, and China itself has higher capabilities to build distribution chain pipelines to encourage the expansion of AI?

Consider only 1 place – electric vehicles. Is there that a nationwide charging system controlled by the authorities, as well as sufficient funding or direction in that region? Is there a coherent national initiative for developing superior battery technologies? On the contrary, phasing out federal tax credits for buyers of EV brands which have spanned the 200,000 automobiles sold indicate, for that matter, is really counter-intuitive to developing an EV-friendly sector. There’s no comprehensive plan for electric vehicles in which the authorities is worried.

China is precisely the opposite in which honor. The nation as a whole is driving towards an EV future, and has crossed the U.S. to become the biggest EV marketplace in the world.

Are we at this point regarding AI? If # & you 8217;ll notice, Kratsios’ mention U.S. leadership in the field of AI is in the past tense – “has been.” That might no more be the case. Countries like Singapore, South Korea and Germany have comprehensive AI growth and deployment strategies in place. The U.S. is simply getting started, and the American AI Initiative is just a first step towards creating a single.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept